+40.85651, -73.83542
40°51'23" N, 73°50'08" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 907F over AMTRAK/CSXT/P&W
Structure number:000000002229560
Location:2.4 MI N I278&I678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Total length:235.9 ft. [71.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.3 ft. [31.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Skew angle:55°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1907
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:47,173 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:93.2 tons [84.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:50.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$24,502,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201650.0FairGoodSatisfactoryFairFO47173
November 201450.0FairGoodSatisfactoryFairFO45267
May 201250.0FairVery GoodFairFairFO45300
June 201050.0FairVery GoodFairFairFO45028
November 200850.0FairVery GoodFairFairFO45028
August 200650.0FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO45028
November 200450.0FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO45028
July 200250.0FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO42034
July 200054.0FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO42034
December 199853.0FairVery GoodFairGoodFO42034
July 199639.0PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD31235
December 199436.8PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD48100
December 199236.8PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD48100
September 199036.8PoorSatisfactoryPoorFair-48100