65TH PLACE over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.74002, -73.89976
40°44'24" N, 73°53'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:65TH PLACE over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230520
Location:.1 MI SE JCT I278 & SH 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.6 ft. [20.3 m]
Total length:139.1 ft. [42.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:54°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,798 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,568,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201674.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-6798
February 201474.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-6234
February 201274.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-6200
February 201074.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-8177
February 200862.0FairFairSatisfactoryFair-8177
January 200662.0FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO8177
February 200462.0FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO8177
March 200262.0FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO13117
January 200074.0FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO13117
January 199861.0PoorPoorGoodFairSD13117
February 199647.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryPoorSD25000
January 199449.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryPoorSD25000
March 199249.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryPoorSD25000
June 199063.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryFairSD25000