RTE 25 over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.74085, -73.89874
40°44'27" N, 73°53'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000002230530
Location:JCT I278+ROUTE 25
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:54.8 ft. [16.7 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:198.8 ft. [60.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:252.0 ft. [76.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Year reconstructed:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:45,110 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$14,378,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201694.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-45110
October 201494.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-45110
November 201294.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-45100
November 201094.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-63570
December 200894.0GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO63570
October 200694.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO63570
August 200494.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO63570
August 200294.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO63570
June 200082.0FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO63570
September 199894.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO63570
December 199766.0PoorFairPoorFairSD63570
October 199664.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD63570
August 199564.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD63570
August 199464.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD63570
September 199364.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD63570
October 199264.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD63570
December 199066.0PoorFairPoorPoorSD63570