RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C


+40.60373, -74.01927
40°36'13" N, 74°01'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907C over RTE 907C, RTE 907C
Structure number:000000002231290
Location:2.2 MI SE 86ST&SHORE PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Total length:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,286 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:103.7 tons [94.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$192,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201589.5GoodExcellentExcellentGoodFO3286
June 201388.5GoodExcellentExcellentGoodFO9693
May 201187.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
May 200987.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
May 200787.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
May 200587.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
May 200388.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
May 200188.9GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO13409
June 199988.8GoodVery GoodExcellentGood-14199
June 199788.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-14199
March 199597.8FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory-1000