Share:

FARMERS BOULEVARD over RTE 907D, RTE 907D

Map

Coordinates:
+40.66691, -73.76703
40°40'01" N, 73°46'01" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FARMERS BOULEVARD over RTE 907D, RTE 907D
Structure number:000000002231620
Location:1.8 MI E JCT I678 & BL PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Skew angle:12°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,925 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:38.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$34,713,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
April 2016PoorFairPoorPoor1292538.0
April 2014PoorFairPoorPoor1292512.7
May 2012PoorPoorPoorSatisfactory1290012.7
May 2010PoorPoorPoorSatisfactory173059.8
June 2008PoorPoorPoorSatisfactory173059.8
June 2006PoorPoorPoorSatisfactory1552611.0
May 2005PoorPoorPoorSatisfactory1552611.0
June 2004PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1552613.4
May 2003PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1552613.4
June 2002PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1708111.0
June 2001PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1708111.0
February 2000PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1708111.0
March 1999PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1708111.0
April 1998PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory893216.0
June 1997Poor-PoorSatisfactory893216.0
June 1996Poor-PoorFair89329.9
June 1995Poor-PoorFair1016010.9
May 1994Poor-PoorFair1016010.9
June 1993Poor-PoorFair1016010.9
May 1992Poor-PoorFair1016010.9
October 1990Poor-PoorPoor1016023.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.6906720
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.138013800
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.188018800
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.9300910200
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.6,29804,6391,6590
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.4,41804,398200