Share:

FRANCIS LWIS BLVD over RTE 907B

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.66851, -73.73799
40°40'07" N, 73°44'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FRANCIS LWIS BLVD over RTE 907B
Structure number:000000002231690
Location:5.4 MI S GCP & CRS ISL PK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:76.8 ft. [23.4 m]
Total length:81.7 ft. [24.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1954
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,014 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.4 tons [24.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:55.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$14,708,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201655.4Fair-FairGoodFO7014
March 201465.7Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO7009
March 201265.7Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO7000
April 201065.0Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17012
April 200865.0Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17012
March 200665.0Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17012
March 200465.0Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17012
May 200264.6Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10310
March 200063.6FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10310
May 199839.8PoorExcellentPoorSatisfactorySD10310
May 199633.2Poor-PoorPoorSD10310
March 199436.2Poor-PoorPoorSD10310
March 199236.2Poor-PoorPoorSD10310
May 199043.7Poor-PoorFairSD10310