Share:

RTE 1 over METRO NO COMMUTER

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.86130, -73.89068
40°51'41" N, 73°53'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 1 over METRO NO COMMUTER
Structure number:000000002241839
Location:AT FORDHAM
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:555.1 ft. [169.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:596.5 ft. [181.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1889
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35,981 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.8 tons [87.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:86.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$24,293,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201586.9GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO35981
August 201386.9GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO35981
July 201193.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO3745
August 200993.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO3745
November 200793.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO3745
June 200593.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3745
June 200393.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3745
November 200197.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3745
October 199997.3GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3745
July 199772.9FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory-8070
May 199628.3PoorSeriousPoorPoorSD8070
October 199528.7PoorSeriousPoorPoorSD8070
August 199421.0PoorSeriousPoorSeriousSD23000
September 199321.0PoorSeriousPoorSeriousSD23000
February 199221.0PoorSeriousPoorSeriousSD23000