Share:

ST JOHNS PLACE over NYCTA FRANKLIN LN

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.67264, -73.95843
40°40'22" N, 73°57'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ST JOHNS PLACE over NYCTA FRANKLIN LN
Structure number:000000002243180
Location:AT CROWN HEIGHTS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1999
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,729 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.9 tons [72.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,294,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201591.9GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO2729
August 201391.8GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO3151
August 201191.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO3151
September 200991.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO3290
September 200791.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3151
September 200591.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3151
December 200391.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-3151
November 200178.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-2612
November 199978.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-2612
April 199811.8PoorSeriousSeriousFairSD2612
October 199711.8PoorSeriousSeriousFairSD2612
May 19962.0PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD4000
December 19957.4PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD3000
December 19947.4PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD3000
July 19937.4PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD3000
July 19927.4PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD3000
November 19917.4PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD3000