11TH AVENUE over N Y & ATLANTIC/LI, NYCTA
Map
Coordinates:
+40.63066, -74.0038240°37'50" N, 74°00'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | 11TH AVENUE over N Y & ATLANTIC/LI, NYCTA |
Structure number: | 000000002243630 |
Location: | AT NEW UTRECHT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 148.0 ft. [45.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1906 |
Year reconstructed: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,555 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Inventory rating: | 84.8 tons [77.1 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $5,461,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
July 2016 | 92.5 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 9555 |
July 2014 | 92.7 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 6929 |
November 2012 | 92.7 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | FO | 6929 |
January 2011 | 92.7 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | FO | 6929 |
December 2008 | 92.7 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | FO | 7068 |
September 2006 | 92.7 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 6929 |
October 2004 | 74.6 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 6929 |
August 2002 | 74.6 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | FO | 6929 |
October 2000 | 78.6 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | FO | 6929 |
March 2000 | 61.5 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | FO | 6929 |
July 1998 | 61.3 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | FO | 10100 |
November 1997 | 23.8 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
September 1996 | 10.1 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
October 1995 | 12.5 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
December 1994 | 12.5 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
October 1993 | 2.0 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
September 1992 | 2.0 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |
November 1991 | 2.0 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Serious | SD | 10100 |