WEST DRIVE over FEEDER TO LAKE
Map
Coordinates:
+40.77865, -73.9724440°46'43" N, 73°58'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WEST DRIVE over FEEDER TO LAKE |
Structure number: | 000000002246330 |
Location: | IN CENTRAL PARK |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 67.3 ft. [20.5 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1860 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 879 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.2 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,326,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 879 | 67.2 |
January 2016 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 882 | 67.2 |
January 2014 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5107 | 65.3 |
January 2012 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5100 | 65.3 |
February 2010 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 66.9 |
February 2008 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 66.9 |
March 2006 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 66.9 |
February 2004 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 66.9 |
March 2002 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 66.7 |
February 2000 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 65.7 |
January 1998 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8500 | 65.7 |
March 1996 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 8500 | 56.7 |
March 1994 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 8500 | 55.0 |
March 1992 | Poor | - | Fair | Poor | 8500 | 41.3 |
April 1990 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Fair | 8500 | 51.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Masonry Arch | linear ft. | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 134 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Masonry Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 54 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 0 |