Share:

RTE 25 over LIRR-N SHORE YARD

Map

Coordinates:
+40.74305, -73.94904
40°44'35" N, 73°56'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:RTE 25 over LIRR-N SHORE YARD
Structure number:000000002247270
Location:AT HUNTERS POINT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Total length:274.0 ft. [83.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.3 ft. [19.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:21°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1908
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,233 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$872,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201580.0GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO5233
September 201379.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO9360
November 201184.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO9360
November 200984.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO6535
November 200784.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO9360
August 200588.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9360
July 200388.0GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-9360
July 200197.6GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-9360
June 199997.6GoodExcellentGoodGood-9360
November 199798.9FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-1500
November 199587.9FairVery GoodFairFair-1500
September 199374.8FairVery GoodFairFair-1500
April 199337.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD1500
August 199037.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD1500