Share:

SNOWMOBILE TRAIL over N BR MOOSE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+43.75851, -74.93354
43°45'31" N, 74°56'01" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SNOWMOBILE TRAIL over N BR MOOSE RIVER
Structure number:000000002263570
Location:1.5 MILES SE OF CARTER
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Total length:103.0 ft. [31.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1895
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:22.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,984,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory-22.6
September 2016PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory-22.6
September 2015PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory126.4
August 2014PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory126.4
August 2013PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory119.0
July 2012PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory119.0
July 2011PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory121.0
July 2010PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory121.0
July 2009PoorSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactory119.0
August 2008PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory121.0
September 2007PoorGoodPoorSatisfactory122.6
August 2006PoorGoodPoorSatisfactory122.6
July 2005PoorGoodPoorSatisfactory121.0
October 2004FairGoodFairSatisfactory133.6
November 2003FairVery GoodFairVery Good138.6

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Stringerlinear ft.825825000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.825000825
Steel Trusslinear ft.206002060
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.1,9930001,993
Steel Floor Beamlinear ft.1350231120
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.159000159
Steel Pin or Pin & Hangar Assemblyeach1200120
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.1200012
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.4646000
Deck
Timber Decksq. ft.2,04602,04600
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,3411,341000
Bearings
Movable Bearingeach90720
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.90009
Fixed Bearingeach90900
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.90009
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.206020600
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.1,1290001,129