RTE 907V over PED UP NR 148 ST
Map
Coordinates:
+40.82949, -73.9516140°49'46" N, 73°57'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | RTE 907V over PED UP NR 148 ST |
Structure number: | 000000002266229 |
Location: | RTE 9A NEAR 148 ST |
Purpose: | Carries highway over pedestrian/bicycle trail |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 72.8 ft. [22.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Year reconstructed: | 1980 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 132,812 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 82.2 tons [74.7 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,969,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
January 2016 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | FO | 132812 |
January 2014 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | FO | 132812 |
February 2012 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | FO | 132800 |
February 2010 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 132812 |
February 2008 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 132812 |
April 2006 | 84.0 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 132711 |
March 2004 | 88.3 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 51800 |
April 2002 | 87.3 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | FO | 51800 |
April 2000 | 71.7 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 51800 |
March 1998 | 71.7 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 51800 |
April 1996 | 50.0 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | SD | 51800 |
June 1994 | 52.3 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | SD | 47634 |
April 1992 | 52.6 | Poor | - | Poor | Satisfactory | SD | 52400 |
June 1990 | 48.0 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | SD | 52400 |