RTE 907L over RTE 907L, Ent to UN Plaz


+40.75181, -73.96506
40°45'07" N, 73°57'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 907L over RTE 907L, Ent to UN Plaz
Structure number:000000002266630
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:119.8 ft. [36.5 m]
Total length:438.0 ft. [133.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.5 ft. [3.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,345 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:98.7 tons [89.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$83,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201693.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO6345
November 201493.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO6319
November 201293.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO6760
November 201093.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO6760
November 200893.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery GoodFO6760
June 200693.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good-6760
July 200493.7GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good-6760
November 200293.7GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-6760
November 200093.7GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-6760
December 199893.7GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-6760
August 19975.0PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD6000
August 19962.0PoorSeriousSeriousSeriousSD6000
May 19952.0PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD6000
August 19942.0PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD6000
July 19932.0PoorSeriousSeriousPoorSD6000
October 19922.0PoorSerious--SD6000
July 19912.0PoorSerious--SD6000