Share:

RIVER STREET over AUSABLE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+44.50093, -73.48552
44°30'03" N, 73°29'08" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RIVER STREET over AUSABLE RIVER
Structure number:000000003302200
Location:VILLAGE OF KEESEVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:107.0 ft. [32.6 m]
Total length:217.9 ft. [66.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1878
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Open Grating [3]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Bridge closed to all traffic [K]
Average daily traffic:56 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:2.0 tons [1.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:19.9
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$8,888,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201619.9PoorFairSeriousPoorSD56
July 201519.8PoorFairSeriousPoorSD88
August 201418.5PoorFairSeriousPoorSD88
August 201318.5PoorFairSeriousPoorSD88
September 201218.5PoorFairSeriousPoorSD90
September 201118.5PoorFairImminent FailurePoorSD90
September 201018.5PoorFairImminent FailureFairSD88
December 200912.4PoorGoodImminent FailureFairSD2000
September 200812.4PoorGoodImminent FailureFairSD2000
October 200712.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
September 200612.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
August 200512.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
October 200412.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
September 200312.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
October 200212.4PoorGoodSeriousFairSD2000
August 200112.4FairGoodFairFairFO2000
October 200012.4FairGoodFairFairFO2000
November 199812.4PoorGoodFairSeriousSD2000
July 199712.4PoorSatisfactorySeriousSeriousSD2000
September 199615.2PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000
August 199514.6PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000
October 199414.6PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000
October 199314.6PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000
August 199214.6PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000
August 199112.9PoorFairSeriousSeriousSD2000