RTE 11 over ONEIDA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.23999, -76.1406443°14'24" N, 76°08'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 11 over ONEIDA RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000004008540 |
Location: | JCT RTE 11 + ONEIDA LAKE |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 207.7 ft. [63.3 m] |
Total length: | 388.1 ft. [118.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.6 ft. [13.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Year reconstructed: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,884 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 62.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37] |
Estimated cost of work: | $19,630,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 6884 | 62.4 |
August 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 7067 | 62.4 |
August 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 6950 | 62.4 |
August 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 6900 | 63.8 |
August 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 7266 | 79.9 |
September 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7266 | 92.5 |
November 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7266 | 92.5 |
September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 8716 | 81.4 |
September 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6833 | 92.7 |
August 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6833 | 91.7 |
September 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 6833 | 91.7 |
September 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7464 | 87.6 |
September 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 7395 | 76.6 |
September 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 7395 | 61.1 |
July 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 7010 | 61.2 |
June 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 7882 | 61.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 352 | 0 | 236 | 116 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 8,201 | 0 | 7,401 | 400 | 400 |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 2,667 | 0 | 2,252 | 415 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 15,365 | 0 | 13,915 | 700 | 750 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 17,077 | 0 | 16,427 | 650 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 15,636 | 0 | 0 | 15,636 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Steel Truss | linear ft. | 415 | 0 | 0 | 415 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 18,862 | 0 | 16,362 | 1,000 | 1,500 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 1,295 | 0 | 1,273 | 22 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 14,374 | 0 | 12,874 | 750 | 750 |
Steel Gusset Plate | each | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 800 | 0 | 640 | 80 | 80 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 126 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 98 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 88 | 0 | 22 | 66 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 88 | 0 | 32 | 23 | 33 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 88 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 38 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,563 | 0 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 5,068 | 0 | 5,068 | 0 | 0 |