RTE I295 over Cross Island Pkwy


+40.78827, -73.79057
40°47'18" N, 73°47'26" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE I295 over Cross Island Pkwy
Structure number:00000000552126B
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Tolls:Yes [1]
Length of largest span:134.8 ft. [41.1 m]
Total length:1104.1 ft. [336.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:Local Toll Authority [32]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:115,453 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:18% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:49.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$21,292,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017FairGoodSatisfactoryFair11545349.0
October 2015FairGoodSatisfactoryFair11189050.0
October 2013FairGoodGoodFair10458952.0
August 2011FairGoodGoodFair10458950.0
August 2009FairGoodGoodFair10458950.0
August 2007FairGoodGoodFair7243050.0
August 2005FairGoodGoodFair10458950.0
August 2003FairGoodGoodFair10458949.0
July 2001FairGoodGoodFair10458949.0
August 1999FairGoodGoodFair10458949.0
August 1997FairGoodSatisfactoryFair10458949.3
October 1995PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor10458934.2
August 1994PoorFairPoorPoor10458933.2
June 1992PoorPoorPoorPoor10458929.8
October 1990PoorFairFairPoor10458934.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.4,4164,28851230
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.86,85886,8332500
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.26,50226,38111830
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.26,50026,500000
Reinforced Concrete Columneach111820
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.28101080
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.338122171450
Compression Jointlinear ft.388382600
Elastomeric Bearingeach96544020
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.840840000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.2,2082,058140100