HR 6 AND HR 11 over LOWER LEVEL
Map
Coordinates:
+40.84907, -73.9413640°50'57" N, 73°56'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HR 6 AND HR 11 over LOWER LEVEL |
Structure number: | 000000005522510 |
Location: | SE JCT 95I & RTE 9A |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 53.8 ft. [16.4 m] |
Total length: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 55.8 ft. [17.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 23° |
Owner: | Local Toll Authority [32] |
Year built: | 1960 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 92.7 tons [84.3 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $977,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
July 2015 | 77.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | - |
July 2013 | 76.2 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
July 2011 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
July 2009 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
July 2007 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
July 2005 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
August 2003 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
September 2001 | 82.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | FO | 13126 |
August 1999 | 93.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 13126 |
September 1997 | 82.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | FO | 3277 |
September 1995 | 63.2 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | SD | 23000 |
November 1993 | 77.8 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | FO | 23000 |
July 1991 | 64.2 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | SD | 23000 |