Share:

E. 9th St. over SR 2

Map

Coordinates:
+41.50750, -81.69333
41°30'27" N, 81°41'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:E. 9th St. over SR 2
Structure number:1800094
Location:APPROX .5 MI E W3RD ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Year reconstructed:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,737 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.7 tons [33.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:58.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201658.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO15737
November 201558.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO51571
August 201458.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO51571
November 201369.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO51571
December 201269.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO51571
May 201169.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO51571
October 201069.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO51571
September 200958.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO51571
November 200869.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO51571
October 200769.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO51571
July 200669.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO51571
April 200569.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO51571
April 200469.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO51571
March 200369.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO51571
May 200273.5GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO51571
October 200073.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO1000
September 199973.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO1000
September 199873.5GoodVery GoodGoodGood-1000
August 199773.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
November 199673.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
November 199569.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
August 199469.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
April 199369.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
September 199269.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000
April 199169.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-1000