SR 6 over US 6


+41.48861, -81.71972
41°29'19" N, 81°43'11" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 6 over US 6
Structure number:1800841
Location:APPROX. 80FT W W45TH ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:43°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,170 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.2 tons [21.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$100,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201662.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9170
September 201568.6FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO1000
June 201474.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO1000
August 201324.0PoorGoodSeriousFairSD1000
October 201224.0PoorSatisfactorySeriousFairSD1000
May 201175.5FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO1000
October 201075.5FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO1000
December 200975.5FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO1000
November 200875.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO1000
November 200762.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO1000
June 200662.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO1000
June 200562.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO1000
September 200462.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO1000
October 200362.5FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO1000
November 200266.5FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO1000
November 200073.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO300
July 199973.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO300
August 199873.0FairGoodFairSatisfactoryFO300
December 199773.0FairGoodFairGoodFO300
September 199673.0FairGoodFairGoodFO300
July 199568.5FairGoodFairGoodFO300
May 199479.5FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGoodFO300
April 199368.5FairGoodFairGoodFO300
June 199268.5FairGoodFairGoodFO300
April 199168.5FairGoodFairGoodFO300