Share:

BADER AVE over OVER CSL DRAINAGE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.42500, -81.71167
41°25'30" N, 81°42'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BADER AVE over OVER CSL DRAINAGE CREEK
Structure number:1867792
Location:W OFF STATE ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1927
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 1990]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$5,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201691.7Fair6 out of 10-100
April 201588.0Fair5 out of 10-100
October 201399.0Fair6 out of 10-100
May 2012100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
May 2011100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
June 2010100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
June 2009100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
November 2002100.0Good7 out of 10-100
September 2000100.0Good7 out of 10-100
September 1999100.0Good7 out of 10-100
August 1998100.0Good7 out of 10-100
August 1997100.0Good7 out of 10-100
September 1996100.0Good7 out of 10-100
July 1995100.0Good7 out of 10-100
April 1994100.0Good7 out of 10-100
April 1993100.0Good7 out of 10-100
May 1991100.0Good7 out of 10-100