+39.93611, -83.12333
39°56'10" N, 83°07'24" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:I-270 over SCIOTO BIG RUN
Structure number:2512483
Location:3.76 MIN OF US62
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Total length:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30,828 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:28% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.9

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201688.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-30828
September 201588.4GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-35600
August 201488.4GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-35600
July 201388.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-35600
July 201288.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-35600
September 201188.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-35600
August 201088.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-40065
October 200988.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-40065
November 200887.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-40065
October 200787.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-40065
September 200688.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-36940
November 200588.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-36940
October 200488.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-36830
October 200388.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-36830
September 200289.4FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-23445
August 200089.3FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-23445
September 199989.3FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGood-23445
August 199889.3GoodGoodVery GoodGood-23445
July 199688.7GoodGoodVery GoodGood-29580
October 199589.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-29580
September 199489.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-29580
July 199389.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-29580
July 199289.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-29580
July 199189.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-29580

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Columneach2424000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.122122000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.122122000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.172172000
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.4,7474,747000