Share:

GREENLAWN AVE over SCIOTO RIVER (GREENLAWN)

Map

Coordinates:
+39.93947, -83.00103
39°56'22" N, 83°00'04" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:GREENLAWN AVE over SCIOTO RIVER (GREENLAWN)
Structure number:2531755
Location:0.2 MI WEST OF HIGH ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Total length:836.0 ft. [254.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:76.4 ft. [23.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1974
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,212 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:97.5

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017GoodVery GoodGoodGood521297.5
August 2016GoodVery GoodGoodGood521297.5
August 2015GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
November 2014GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
February 2014GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
January 2013GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
November 2011GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
January 2011GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432094.9
January 2010GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432093.9
January 2009GoodVery GoodGoodGood1432093.9
January 2008FairExcellentGoodSatisfactory1432093.9
January 2007PoorPoorGoodSatisfactory2810081.0
January 2006PoorPoorGoodSatisfactory2810081.0
December 2004PoorPoorGoodSatisfactory2810081.0
December 2002PoorPoorGoodSatisfactory2810081.0
November 2001FairFairGoodSatisfactory2810083.0
December 2000FairFairGoodSatisfactory2810083.0
August 1999FairFairGoodSatisfactory2810083.0
December 1998FairFairGoodSatisfactory2810083.0
December 1996FairFairGoodSatisfactory2810083.0
December 1995FairFairGoodSatisfactory2496783.0
December 1994FairFairGoodSatisfactory2496783.0
December 1993FairFairGoodSatisfactory2496783.0
October 1992FairFairGoodSatisfactory2030084.1
December 1991GoodGoodGoodGood2030085.3