Share:

MACLAM DRIVE over (O) DRY RUN

Map

Coordinates:
+39.96833, -83.09167
39°58'06" N, 83°05'30" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MACLAM DRIVE over (O) DRY RUN
Structure number:2560534
Location:150 FT N/FISHER ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1977
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,957 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
October 201680.0Good7 out of 10-14957
December 201590.3Good7 out of 10-500
November 201490.3Good7 out of 10-500
June 201390.3Fair6 out of 10-500
July 201290.3Fair6 out of 10-500
July 201190.3Fair6 out of 10-500
July 201090.3Fair6 out of 10-500
August 200790.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 200690.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 200590.3Good7 out of 10-500
August 200490.3Good7 out of 10-500
October 200290.3Good7 out of 10-500
October 200190.3Good7 out of 10-500
October 200090.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 199890.3Good7 out of 10-500
October 199790.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 199690.3Good7 out of 10-500
December 199591.3Good7 out of 10-500
August 199491.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 199391.3Good7 out of 10-500
September 199291.3Good7 out of 10-500
December 199191.3Good7 out of 10-500