Share:

EDWARDS FARMS ROAD over (O) HAYDEN RUN

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:EDWARDS FARMS ROAD over (O) HAYDEN RUN
Structure number:2562340
Location:83 FT S/HAYDEN RUN RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:71.3 tons [64.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.1

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
September 201693.1Good7 out of 10-100
October 201593.1Good7 out of 10-100
October 201493.1Good7 out of 10-100
July 201393.1Good7 out of 10-100
July 201293.1Good7 out of 10-100
July 201193.1Fair6 out of 10-100
September 201094.1Fair6 out of 10-100
October 200794.1Good8 out of 10-100
November 200694.1Good8 out of 10-100
200090.0-N out of 10-100