ARBOR ROSE WAY over (O) Dysar Creek


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ARBOR ROSE WAY over (O) Dysar Creek
Structure number:2563266
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:67.3 tons [61.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.3 tons [36.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
September 2016100.0Good7 out of 10-100
December 2015100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
October 2014100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
May 2013100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
June 2012100.0Good7 out of 10-100
June 2011100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
June 2010100.0Fair6 out of 10-100
September 2007100.0Good7 out of 10-100
November 2005100.0Good8 out of 10-100