ARBOR ROSE WAY over (O) Dysar Creek


+39.99497, -82.78658
39°59'42" N, 82°47'12" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ARBOR ROSE WAY over (O) Dysar Creek
Structure number:2563266
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:98.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
June 2017Good7 out of 1010098.0
September 2016Good7 out of 10100100.0
December 2015Fair6 out of 10100100.0
October 2014Fair6 out of 10100100.0
May 2013Fair6 out of 10100100.0
June 2012Good7 out of 10100100.0
June 2011Fair6 out of 10100100.0
June 2010Fair6 out of 10100100.0
September 2007Good7 out of 10100100.0
November 2005Good8 out of 10100100.0