Share:

BEEKMAN AVENUE over WEST FORK CHANNEL (BEEKM

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:BEEKMAN AVENUE over WEST FORK CHANNEL (BEEKM
Structure number:3136426
Location:0.1 MI S OF DREMAN BEEK I
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Total length:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1912
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,828 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:106.9 tons [97.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:82.3 tons [74.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:97.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$40,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201697.2GoodGoodVery GoodGood-12828
May 201597.7GoodGoodVery GoodGood-9432
April 201397.7GoodGoodVery GoodGood-9432
May 201297.7GoodGoodVery GoodGood-9432
June 201197.7GoodGoodVery GoodGood-9432
May 201097.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
April 200997.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
April 200897.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
May 200797.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
April 200697.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
February 200597.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
October 200297.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
October 200197.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-9432
October 199997.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellent-9432
November 199897.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellent-9432
October 199574.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-9432
October 199369.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9432
February 199369.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9432
November 199169.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9432
October 199069.8FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9432