WEST FORK ROAD over WEST FORK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.15953, -84.5665139°09'34" N, 84°33'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WEST FORK ROAD over WEST FORK CREEK |
Structure number: | 3137090 |
Location: | AT INT OF W FORK&MONTANA |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 79.1 ft. [24.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 24° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1928 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,651 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $27,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7651 | 78.6 |
March 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7651 | 78.6 |
May 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7651 | 78.6 |
April 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 6800 | 78.8 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6800 | 78.8 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
May 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
April 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
June 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
May 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
February 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
October 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 71.1 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6800 | 70.1 |
November 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6800 | 70.1 |
November 1995 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6800 | 70.1 |
October 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6800 | 70.0 |
December 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6800 | 70.0 |
November 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6800 | 70.0 |
October 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 6800 | 41.9 |