Share:

WOOSTER ROAD over DUCK CREEK (WOOSTER RD

Map

Coordinates:
+39.12202, -84.41086
39°07'19" N, 84°24'39" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:WOOSTER ROAD over DUCK CREEK (WOOSTER RD
Structure number:3137112
Location:0.4MI N OF INT. BCHMNT.&W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:148.0 ft. [45.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.4 ft. [12.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,373 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:83.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$7,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2018GoodGoodGoodGood1337383.8
May 2017GoodGoodGoodGood1337383.8
May 2016GoodGoodGoodGood1337383.8
May 2015GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
April 2014GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
March 2013GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
June 2012GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
June 2011GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
June 2010GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
April 2009GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
May 2008GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
June 2007GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
November 2002GoodGoodGoodGood800084.7
October 2001GoodGoodGoodGood800071.9
February 2000GoodGoodGoodGood800071.9
November 1998GoodGoodGoodGood800071.9
November 1995GoodGoodGoodGood800071.9
November 1993GoodGoodGoodGood800072.8
November 1992GoodGoodGoodGood800072.8
November 1991GoodGoodGoodGood800072.8
October 1990GoodGoodGoodGood800072.8