DICKENS RD over BLACK FORK CR
Map
Coordinates:
+38.86486, -82.5777838°51'53" N, 82°34'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | DICKENS RD over BLACK FORK CR |
Structure number: | 4033132 |
Location: | 1.13 MI N OF CR65 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Total length: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1960 |
Year reconstructed: | 2012 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 209 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 46.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 209 | 46.4 |
November 2017 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 209 | 46.4 |
November 2016 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 209 | 46.6 |
October 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 65 | 49.7 |
October 2014 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 65 | 76.0 |
September 2013 | Fair | Excellent | Very Good | Satisfactory | 65 | 49.5 |
September 2012 | Fair | Excellent | Very Good | Satisfactory | 65 | 49.5 |
March 2011 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 47.5 |
December 2009 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 48.7 |
August 2008 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 48.7 |
June 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 62.0 |
September 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 75.0 |
September 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 75.0 |
September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 75.0 |
June 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 76.0 |
August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 76.0 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 76.0 |
June 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 76.0 |
July 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 76.0 |
December 1994 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 73.0 |
November 1993 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 73.0 |
June 1992 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 73.0 |
June 1990 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 73.0 |