CR56 COST./MT TAB over TOWN FORK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.46470, -80.7470140°27'53" N, 80°44'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR56 COST./MT TAB over TOWN FORK CREEK |
Structure number: | 4130987 |
Location: | 3.7 MI. E. OF JCT CR54 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
Total length: | 92.9 ft. [28.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 337 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 337 | 81.3 |
March 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 337 | 81.3 |
February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 337 | 81.3 |
April 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 640 | 81.1 |
February 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 640 | 81.1 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 640 | 85.2 |
January 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 640 | 85.2 |
February 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 640 | 85.2 |
January 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 640 | 85.2 |
May 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 640 | 85.2 |
November 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 640 | 85.2 |
November 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 640 | 85.2 |
November 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 640 | 85.2 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 640 | 85.2 |