BRADFORD-BLOOMER over STILLWATER RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+40.16500, -84.4133340°09'54" N, 84°24'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BRADFORD-BLOOMER over STILLWATER RIVER |
Structure number: | 5533589 |
Location: | 0.36 N OF SR185 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 118.1 ft. [36.0 m] |
Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1945 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2013
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 631 [as of 2002] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 10.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $408,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 631 | 10.7 |
February 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 631 | 10.7 |
August 2010 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 631 | 41.0 |
February 2010 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 631 | 41.0 |
February 2009 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 631 | 41.0 |
March 2007 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 631 | 41.0 |
February 2005 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 631 | 41.0 |
January 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 431 | 42.3 |
January 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 431 | 52.4 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
February 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
April 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
March 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
February 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
March 1995 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 431 | 51.4 |
March 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 431 | 62.4 |
March 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 431 | 62.4 |
April 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 431 | 62.4 |
February 1991 | Fair | Excellent | Very Good | Satisfactory | 230 | 64.5 |