BENEDICT RD. over CLEARFORK RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+40.59999, -82.4077140°35'60" N, 82°24'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BENEDICT RD. over CLEARFORK RIVER |
Structure number: | 7035462 |
Location: | 0.4M E OF SR 95 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 108.6 ft. [33.1 m] |
Total length: | 113.5 ft. [34.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1913 |
Year reconstructed: | 2006 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 351 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 73.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $613,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 351 | 73.8 |
September 2017 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 351 | 73.8 |
October 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 351 | 73.8 |
September 2015 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
August 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
November 2013 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
October 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
November 2011 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
September 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
March 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
April 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
September 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
November 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 70 | 77.0 |
October 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
October 2002 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
November 2001 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
November 2000 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
August 1999 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
November 1997 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
October 1996 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
August 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 121 | 15.1 |
November 1994 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 121 | 16.7 |
October 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 121 | 16.7 |
October 1991 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Critical | 121 | 15.1 |