ELM SUGAR GROVE CH over TOWN CK*ELM SUGAR GROVEC
Map
Coordinates:
+40.97500, -84.4800040°58'30" N, 84°28'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | ELM SUGAR GROVE CH over TOWN CK*ELM SUGAR GROVEC |
Structure number: | 8132755 |
Location: | 3.80 MI E JCT SR127 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Total length: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 108 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 93.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
September 2016 | 93.5 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 108 |
September 2015 | 99.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
September 2014 | 99.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
November 2013 | 99.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
October 2012 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
October 2011 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
October 2010 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
October 2009 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 72 |
October 2008 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 72 |
October 2007 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 72 |
October 2006 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 72 |
September 2005 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 68 |
September 2004 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 68 |
September 2003 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 68 |
September 2002 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 68 |
September 2000 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 64 |
September 1999 | 94.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 64 |
September 1998 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 64 |
June 1997 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 60 |
March 1996 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 60 |
November 1994 | 94.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 60 |