IRR 5834C over NEOSHO RIVER

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+36.92888, -94.95688
36°55'44" N, 94°57'25" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	IRR 5834C over NEOSHO RIVER
Structure number:	000170000000000
Location:	4.5W OF COMMERCE
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	155.8 ft. `[47.5 m]`
Total length:	422.9 ft. `[128.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	15.7 ft. `[4.8 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	18.0 ft. `[5.5 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	21.7 ft. `[6.6 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1910
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Wood or Timber `[7]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Bridge closed to all traffic `[K]`
Average daily traffic:	100 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	15% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	24.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$546,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2015	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	100	24.0
September 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	100	24.0
September 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	100	24.0
June 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Serious	100	24.0
September 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	100	24.0
May 2005	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	100	20.9
July 2004	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Poor	100	24.0
May 2003	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Serious	100	17.5
August 2002	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Serious	100	17.5
June 2001	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Poor	100	17.5
March 2001	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Poor	100	17.5
January 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Fair	100	17.5
August 1998	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Fair	100	17.5
February 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	100	18.1
October 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	100	18.1
July 1991	Poor	Poor	Fair	Poor	100	21.4