E0760 over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.91307, -96.78078
35°54'47" N, 96°46'51" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	E0760 over CREEK
Structure number:	008060000000000
Location:	1.2N 5.2E OF AGRA
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Total length:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1920
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Wood or Timber `[7]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, temporary structure in place to carry legal loads `[E]`
Average daily traffic:	100 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	10% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Critical `[2 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Critical `[2 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	27.4
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$265,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
March 2018	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
April 2016	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
February 2014	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
April 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
October 2010	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
September 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
October 2008	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
May 2007	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.4
October 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.5
November 2005	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Critical	100	27.5
September 2004	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Poor	100	27.5
October 2003	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Serious	100	27.5
October 2002	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Serious	100	27.5
December 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Critical	Serious	100	27.5
December 1999	Poor	Good	Poor	Serious	100	27.5
November 1998	Poor	Good	Poor	Serious	100	27.5
August 1996	Poor	Very Good	Fair	Poor	100	27.5
September 1995	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	100	24.4
October 1994	Poor	Fair	Poor	Serious	100	26.3
October 1993	Poor	Fair	Poor	Serious	100	26.3
November 1992	Poor	Poor	Serious	Serious	100	24.2