Share:

E0760 over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.91307, -96.78078
35°54'47" N, 96°46'51" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:E0760 over CREEK
Structure number:008060000000000
Location:1.2N 5.2E OF AGRA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, temporary structure in place to carry legal loads [E]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Critical [2 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Critical [2 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:27.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$265,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2018PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
April 2016PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
February 2014PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
April 2011PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
October 2010PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
September 2009PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
October 2008PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
May 2007PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.4
October 2006PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.5
November 2005PoorSatisfactoryCriticalCritical10027.5
September 2004PoorSatisfactoryCriticalPoor10027.5
October 2003PoorSatisfactoryCriticalSerious10027.5
October 2002PoorSatisfactoryCriticalSerious10027.5
December 2000PoorSatisfactoryCriticalSerious10027.5
December 1999PoorGoodPoorSerious10027.5
November 1998PoorGoodPoorSerious10027.5
August 1996PoorVery GoodFairPoor10027.5
September 1995PoorPoorSeriousPoor10024.4
October 1994PoorFairPoorSerious10026.3
October 1993PoorFairPoorSerious10026.3
November 1992PoorPoorSeriousSerious10024.2