U.S. 62 over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.63789, -99.0571434°38'16" N, 99°03'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | U.S. 62 over CREEK |
Structure number: | 021990000000000 |
Old structure number: | 7102 0244 X (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2.5 MI E JACKSON C/L |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 167.0 ft. [50.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 169.0 ft. [51.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,500 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $644,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4500 | 86.4 |
April 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4500 | 86.4 |
April 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4500 | 86.4 |
April 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4300 | 87.0 |
April 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5300 | 84.9 |
April 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5400 | 84.9 |
April 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5400 | 84.9 |
December 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3780 | 81.3 |
October 1999 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 3780 | 58.7 |
January 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 3590 | 58.7 |
April 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2800 | 84.3 |
March 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2800 | 84.3 |
January 1991 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2600 | 83.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 338 | 0 | 338 | 0 | 0 |