U.S. 277 over DEEP RED CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+34.22027, -98.4529334°13'13" N, 98°27'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | U.S. 277 over DEEP RED CREEK |
Structure number: | 065830000000000 |
Old structure number: | 1708 0319 X (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 3.1 N JCT US 70 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Total length: | 368.1 ft. [112.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1938 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 600 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,701,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 600 | 47.3 |
February 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 600 | 42.9 |
January 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 600 | 42.9 |
March 2012 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 600 | 42.9 |
September 2010 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 580 | 80.9 |
December 2009 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 550 | 81.0 |
January 2008 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 810 | 60.8 |
June 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 510 | 67.7 |
January 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 600 | 68.2 |
February 2004 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 650 | 68.0 |
July 2002 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 690 | 79.3 |
March 2000 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 690 | 68.8 |
August 1996 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 580 | 68.2 |
November 1994 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 530 | 71.2 |
June 1992 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 500 | 73.4 |