E0773 over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.89443, -95.1156135°53'40" N, 95°06'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | E0773 over CREEK |
Structure number: | 068870000000000 |
Old structure number: | 11E0773N4430006 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2.6 S 1.5 E OF HULBERT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1939 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 62.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $225,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 50 | 62.2 |
September 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 50 | 62.2 |
October 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Very Good | 50 | 70.2 |
September 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Very Good | 50 | 70.2 |
November 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 50 | 69.8 |
June 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 80.9 |
April 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 69.8 |
April 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 69.8 |
April 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 70.8 |
April 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 70.8 |
May 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 58.0 |
May 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 48.8 |
April 1993 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 100 | 33.9 |
April 1991 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 100 | 28.9 |