E1625 over CREEK


+34.65801, -96.37441
34°39'29" N, 96°22'28" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:E1625 over CREEK
Structure number:080410000000000
Old structure number:15E1625N3720009 (from 1992 edition)
Location:3.5N;1.6W OF CENTRAHOMA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:84.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$236,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5084.7
March 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5091.1
March 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good5091.1
March 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good5091.1
June 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5091.1
May 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5091.1
June 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5091.1
August 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5078.3
June 2002PoorFairSatisfactoryPoor5050.3
August 2000PoorFairSatisfactoryPoor5043.9
April 1998PoorFairSatisfactoryPoor5043.9
April 1996PoorFairSatisfactorySerious5033.9
March 1994GoodGoodGoodGood10075.1
March 1992GoodGoodGoodGood10075.2