Share: 
E1625 over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.65801, -96.37441
34°39'29" N, 96°22'28" W
+34.65801, -96.37441
34°39'29" N, 96°22'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | E1625 over CREEK |
| Structure number: | 080410000000000 |
| Old structure number: | 15E1625N3720009 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 3.5N;1.6W OF CENTRAHOMA |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2016] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 84.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $236,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 84.7 |
| March 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| March 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| March 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| June 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| May 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| June 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 91.1 |
| August 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 78.3 |
| June 2002 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 50.3 |
| August 2000 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 43.9 |
| April 1998 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 43.9 |
| April 1996 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Serious | 50 | 33.9 |
| March 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.1 |
| March 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 75.2 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1429384
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1429384