3510C over WASHITA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.23033, -96.9095534°13'49" N, 96°54'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 3510C over WASHITA RIVER |
Structure number: | 128510000000000 |
Old structure number: | 35E1920N3420004 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 3. N 1.6 W MANNSVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
Total length: | 565.0 ft. [172.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1952 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 125 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $684,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 125 | 0.0 |
August 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 125 | 0.0 |
August 2013 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 125 | 0.0 |
September 2011 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 125 | 0.0 |
November 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 125 | 23.2 |
November 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 125 | 23.2 |
August 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 26.0 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 23.7 |
November 2002 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 0.0 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 23.7 |
February 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 20.8 |
February 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 100 | 22.1 |
February 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 41.7 |
February 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 40.7 |