S.H. 47 over CREEK


+35.83811, -99.49824
35°50'17" N, 99°29'54" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:S.H. 47 over CREEK
Structure number:159470000000000
Location:13.2 MI E JCT U.S. 283
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:960 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:96.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$644,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
August 2017Good7 out of 1096096.0
July 2015Good7 out of 1096096.0
July 2013Good7 out of 1096096.0
July 2011Good7 out of 1044098.0
July 2009Good7 out of 1045097.9
July 2007Good7 out of 1045097.9
July 2005Good7 out of 1044098.0
August 2003Good7 out of 1042098.0
July 2001Good7 out of 1040098.1
April 1999Fair5 out of 1040086.9
July 1997Fair5 out of 1034084.1
June 1995Good7 out of 1040098.1
March 1993Fair6 out of 1045094.9