S.H. 7D over CREEK


+34.40023, -96.49615
34°24'01" N, 96°29'46" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:S.H. 7D over CREEK
Structure number:189270000000000
Location:1.4 MI N JCT SH7
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:290 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$644,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2018Good8 out of 1029099.5
April 2016Good8 out of 1029099.5
April 2014Good8 out of 1029099.5
April 2012Good8 out of 1029099.5
April 2010Good8 out of 1025099.5
April 2008Good8 out of 1027099.5
February 2006Good7 out of 1027099.5
January 2004Good8 out of 1031099.4
February 2002Good7 out of 1033099.4
January 2000Good7 out of 1033099.4
February 1997Good7 out of 1036099.3
December 1995Good7 out of 1030099.4
October 1993Fair6 out of 1030096.4
September 1991Good7 out of 1030096.4