S.H. 7D over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.40023, -96.4961534°24'01" N, 96°29'46" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | S.H. 7D over CREEK |
Structure number: | 189270000000000 |
Location: | 1.4 MI N JCT SH7 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 290 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $644,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 290 | 99.5 |
April 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 290 | 99.5 |
April 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 290 | 99.5 |
April 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 290 | 99.5 |
April 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 250 | 99.5 |
April 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 270 | 99.5 |
February 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 270 | 99.5 |
January 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 310 | 99.4 |
February 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 330 | 99.4 |
January 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 330 | 99.4 |
February 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 360 | 99.3 |
December 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 99.4 |
October 1993 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 300 | 96.4 |
September 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 96.4 |