Share:

ESECO over COTTONWOOD CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.95652, -96.73492
35°57'23" N, 96°44'06" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ESECO over COTTONWOOD CREEK
Structure number:241370000000000
Location:ESECOLINWOOD RD .9E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:41.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$508,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory10041.0
August 2016PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory10041.0
September 2015PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory10041.0
March 2014PoorSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactory10041.0
March 2013PoorSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactory10041.0
March 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10061.5
February 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10061.5
November 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10061.5
March 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10061.5
May 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10061.5
March 2002PoorSatisfactoryFairSerious10041.0
December 1999FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory10047.1
February 1998FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory10047.1
February 1996GoodVery GoodGoodGood10056.3