Share:

US 30 (HWY 2W) over BIG CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+46.16752, -123.59247
46°10'03" N, 123°35'33" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US 30 (HWY 2W) over BIG CREEK
Structure number:07417 02W 08252
Location:120 MI E ASTORIA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:155.8 ft. [47.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,100 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:20% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Sufficiency rating:71.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$799,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory810071.5
March 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory720059.0
March 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory760059.0
March 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory760059.0
March 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory730044.7
March 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory660054.0
March 2005FairGoodGoodSatisfactory660054.8
March 2003FairGoodGoodFair640045.3
April 2001FairGoodGoodFair630045.3
March 1999FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory600055.9
March 1997GoodGoodVery GoodGood620055.9
March 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood620055.8
March 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood620077.8
November 1990GoodGoodVery GoodGood440082.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.624062400
Steel Floor Beamlinear ft.6868000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.374374000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flangesq. ft.6,0845,93914050
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.4,6804,680000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach42200
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.7871610
Timber Pileeach66000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.7878000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.62431231110
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.2,2531,317312312312