Share:

Sisemore Road over COUCH LATERAL

Map

Coordinates:
+44.13932, -121.41517
44°08'22" N, 121°24'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Sisemore Road over COUCH LATERAL
Structure number:17C02 A09 00520
Location:0.1 MI N TUMALO RES ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1914
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:172 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:49.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$592,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2018PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2016PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2014PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2012PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2011PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2010PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
February 2009PoorPoorPoorPoor17249.2
March 2007PoorPoorPoorPoor16549.1
March 2005PoorPoorPoorPoor16549.1
March 2003PoorPoorPoorPoor16549.1
April 2001PoorPoorPoorPoor16047.1
April 1999FairFairFairFair15065.1
April 1997FairFairFairFair15065.1
March 1996FairFairGoodFair15065.1
February 1994FairFairFairSatisfactory15049.2
February 1992FairFairFairSatisfactory15053.3
March 1990PoorPoorFairSatisfactory15051.3

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.64037270
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.32018140
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.280280000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.1,6801,0085041680
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,6801,680000