Share:

SW 64TH COURT over FANNO CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+45.48771, -122.74226
45°29'16" N, 122°44'32" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SW 64TH COURT over FANNO CREEK
Structure number:25B151000 00000
Location:N OF SW CANBY ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:220 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
September 201681.5Good8 out of 10-220
September 201481.5Good8 out of 10-220
September 201281.5Good8 out of 10-220
October 201084.5Good8 out of 10-220
January 200984.5Good8 out of 10-220
September 200681.5Good8 out of 10-212
October 200481.5Good9 out of 10-212
September 200281.5Good9 out of 10-206
September 200081.5Good9 out of 10-200