RAMP C 279 N.B. over RAMPS B,D,G, F, & Q


+40.43931, -80.01026
40°26'22" N, 80°00'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RAMP C 279 N.B. over RAMPS B,D,G, F, & Q
Structure number:000000000001014
Old structure number:020279006012170 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Total length:671.0 ft. [204.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:1411.2 ft. [430.1 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,249 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:82.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201582.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO14249
November 201370.0FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15026
November 201170.5FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO12475
November 200964.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO42570
November 200764.7FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-41576
November 200549.0FairGoodFairGood-66778
November 200349.0FairGoodFairGood-62822
May 200232.0PoorSeriousFairPoor-53133
May 200032.0PoorSeriousFairPoor-51829
May 199832.0PoorSeriousFairPoorSD49428
May 199632.0PoorSeriousFairPoorSD47509
May 199449.8PoorSeriousSatisfactoryFairSD45000
May 199247.0PoorSeriousSatisfactoryFairSD56140
May 199054.1FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO26499