Share: 
FORBES AVENUE over 9 MILE RUN & FERN HOLLOW
Map
Coordinates:
+40.43950, -79.90030
40°26'22" N, 79°54'01" W
+40.43950, -79.90030
40°26'22" N, 79°54'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FORBES AVENUE over 9 MILE RUN & FERN HOLLOW |
| Structure number: | 000000000002410 |
| Old structure number: | 027301000030330 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 301033 NEAR S BRADDOCK AV |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 166.0 ft. [50.6 m] |
| Total length: | 446.9 ft. [136.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Frame [07] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,500 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 18.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,522,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 14500 | 18.7 |
| September 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 14500 | 18.7 |
| September 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 14500 | 18.7 |
| September 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 14500 | 44.8 |
| September 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 14500 | 59.9 |
| March 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 14500 | 59.9 |
| September 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 14500 | 59.9 |
| September 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 60.9 |
| September 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 60.9 |
| November 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 60.9 |
| November 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 61.7 |
| November 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 61.7 |
| December 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 14500 | 48.1 |
| November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14500 | 64.1 |
| October 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 14200 | 66.2 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1456104
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1456104