RAMP G to FT. DUQ over ALLEG.RIV. FT DUQ WARF
Map
Coordinates:
+40.44321, -80.0085340°26'36" N, 80°00'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | RAMP G to FT. DUQ over ALLEG.RIV. FT DUQ WARF |
Structure number: | 000000000002821 |
Old structure number: | 028041050000000 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | RP.NB FROM 10TH ST.BYPASS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 125.0 ft. [38.1 m] |
Total length: | 1008.9 ft. [307.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 3280.7 ft. [999.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 8 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,859 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Operating rating: | 76.9 tons [69.9 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 93.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
February 2015 | 93.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | - | 3859 |
February 2013 | 92.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | - | 3859 |
February 2011 | 92.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | - | 17637 |
February 2009 | 92.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 3901 |
February 2007 | 92.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 3839 |
February 2005 | 92.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 3801 |
February 2003 | 93.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 4097 |
March 2001 | 93.0 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 4025 |
March 1999 | 82.0 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 3954 |
March 1997 | 79.8 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 3807 |
March 1995 | 81.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 3649 |
March 1993 | 82.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | - | 3535 |